|
|
Post by niala on Aug 18, 2005 18:43:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by niala on Aug 18, 2005 18:44:54 GMT
An additional note, Budge doesn't want Nick to stay with her for the baby but she doesn't mind him staying with her out of guilt? Someone explain this to me please.
|
|
|
|
Post by GoStephanie on Aug 18, 2005 18:56:18 GMT
niala, I'm with you, it's a little too sick. Bridget isn't like her mother, and I don't think she'd marry Icky. I think she'll let him think she had the abortion, marries Dante and they announce weeks later that they are expecting a child. This way Bridget is able to have the baby she doesn't have the heart to abort, but also breaks with Icky, otherwise, he'd be in their lives forever.
I think it's more likely that Icky will be disraught thinking Bridget had an abortion. Brookho, predictably, chases after Icky to comfort him, they declare their love for one another (once again!) and they have "grief sex!" Remember she and Icky had sex after she thought Ridge was dead, when she was oh-so-devastated. Isn't she just so comforting?
|
|
|
|
Post by realitycheck on Aug 18, 2005 19:36:39 GMT
Don't believe that it's not true....
|
|
|
|
Post by niala on Aug 18, 2005 21:16:03 GMT
I agree, it makes much more sense for her to hook up with Dante while Nick is off mourning the loss of his unborn child with Brooke (while in bed)...I can see it now...grief sex seems to be the only kind of sex Hicky can have...I bet if there were no crises, Hicky wouldn't be tempted to go off humping each other.
|
|
provence
B&B Sound manager
Makes your dreams comes true!
Posts: 361
|
Post by provence on Aug 18, 2005 22:18:29 GMT
It can't be true! Stupid all that!
|
|
|
|
Post by cntrygurl7 on Aug 18, 2005 23:18:01 GMT
I don't believe all of that is true, I believe about the first two lines and that is all.
|
|
|
|
Post by niala on Aug 18, 2005 23:25:27 GMT
I'm pretty sure it's not true, just thought I'd share it with you all.
|
|
dee
B&B make-up artist
Posts: 78
|
Post by dee on Aug 19, 2005 5:04:48 GMT
If Bell is trying to redeem Brooke by making Bridget the scape goat, the dog won't hunt for me. Bridget words was that she wanted to stop all of this madness, if she does what the spoilers said, then whatever happens to her she will richly deserve. Nick wants a brood mare. Heck this is the 21st century, no woman is kept barefooted & pregnant anymore. Bell needs to get with the time.
|
|
|
|
Post by angel55l on Aug 19, 2005 8:25:02 GMT
I don't believe that it's true, to the end, I think Ridge will return with his tramp, Bridget will reurn with Nick, and I see Taylor along with her kids with no storyline, Bell don't want that. I am tired about this situation in the B.B. . and I am very desapointed.
|
|
|
|
Post by niala on Aug 19, 2005 13:16:08 GMT
Excellent post Dee! And Angel, I am certain sooner of later, if Brooke and Nick do hook up again, Brooke will dump Nick in a nano-second to go chasing after Ridge (again)!
|
|
|
|
Post by cntrygurl7 on Aug 19, 2005 13:32:10 GMT
I think everything will change if the whole RJ paternity storyline is correct and they find out he is DJ and the Nick will have to choose.
|
|
|
|
Post by GoStephanie on Aug 19, 2005 15:19:52 GMT
I would like to see the fallout from the RJ story line and there would be entertaining fireworks to watch. But I think the writers really need to be more creative about their work and respect viewers more than they have because it seems that the paternity mix up is what has been driving so many of the story lines (deriving from Brookho sleeping around and being so very productive!).
This is a trend that they need to change, except I want to see the Bridget keeping the baby and raising it with Dante and later, have Icky go nutso when he discovers the baby is his after all.
How well adjusted do they expect Thomas and the twins to be if the trend continues? Thomas and the twins need Taylor to guide them, not have Ridge being indecisive and perhaps let Brookho into his life again. What a travesty that would be.
|
|
|
|
Post by niala on Aug 19, 2005 16:20:10 GMT
B&B likes to mass produce screwed up kids, I know that much for sure. The writers definitely need to get real.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cecilia on Aug 19, 2005 19:38:19 GMT
Brooke, Nick & Bridget - the twisted trio!  |
|
|
|
Post by niala on Aug 19, 2005 21:11:39 GMT
Yup Cecilia, you said it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Princess Silvia on Aug 21, 2005 18:03:42 GMT
Well... the original source was never disclosed that I could see. I have many problems with this spoiler:
1. How sick is it for Brooke and Nick to 'celebrate' Bridger's supposed abortion by having sex? Then again, Brooke and Nick celebrated Ridge's supposed death with sex, so that's feasable I guess... YUK!
2. Bridget would never marry Nick if she thought he still loved her mother. Isn't that what we saw this week? Or all of a sudden she puts the blinders on again?
-rumors and spoilers are usually only 'partially' right. I believe that Budge will probably lose the baby, but Brooke pregnant again? How old is this broad? How many pregnancy storylines can she have? Give me a break!! That I do not believe. I do believe that there will be Bricky again and that Budge will end up with Dante, but none of the other nonsense...
|
|
|
|
Post by niala on Aug 21, 2005 19:03:33 GMT
The Brooker being preggers again idea really got me sick. It's a stupid notion. Brooker has had enough kids and screwed them up. Not another one!
|
|
|
|
Post by cntrygurl7 on Aug 22, 2005 2:54:03 GMT
Yes at her age it is a health risk and a sanity risk, she needs to concentrate on the kids she has. I am hoping if she does have Nick's kid that it is by finding out RJ is actually DJ.
|
|
|
|
Post by niala on Aug 22, 2005 3:24:23 GMT
I know, I hope Bell isn't going to reveal RJ as DJ 50 years from now when he has a horrible accident and needs blood from his father...basically another Ridge identity crisis repeat.
|
|
